Asbestos Lawsuit History: What Nobody Has Discussed
Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History Asbestos lawsuits have resulted in the bankruptcies of a number of companies. An asbestos lawyer can assist you in getting compensation. Doctors and health experts long warned about asbestos exposure's dangers. However, the industry's leaders hid the risks. As time went on, asbestos-related diseases were becoming more prevalent. The Third Case Asbestos lawsuits really took off in 1970s, after studies in science began to link asbestos with serious illnesses like mesothelioma or asbestosis. Because asbestos-related diseases don't typically show symptoms until decades after exposure, thousands of lawsuits were filed. These lawsuits were filed in Texas due to its favorable laws. Johns Manville was the leading producer in the 1940s & 1950s of asbestos-related products. This case had a major impact on asbestos litigation. In the 1980s, it was brought to be known that the company's chief executive Lewis Brown prioritized company profits over the health of his employees. In his deposition, Brown admitted to being heavily dependent on Dr. Russell Budd, the chief medical advisor to his company. Budd was an expert in his field who was known for his indifference to the health of employees. Johns Manville was found to have known about the dangers associated with asbestos however, they failed to take any action to safeguard their workers. The court decided that the company was liable for the damages suffered by workers who later developed mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases. The court also held the company liable for damages for families of deceased employees. After the decision in Borel many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from the companies that used asbestos as a material. Unfortunately, most of these claims were dismissed for a variety of reasons. Certain cases were allowed to continue, and the courts developed guidelines for the handling of asbestos-related lawsuits. In the 1990s asbestos defendants were seeking legal rulings that would limit their liability. For instance they wanted to be able to argue that the asbestos materials were not part of their product and therefore shouldn't be held accountable for injuries to people who worked with asbestos. The claims were rejected and the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the “asbestos products” defense. Federal and state laws protect the rights of a mesothelioma patient to seek compensation for their condition from the parties accountable in a particular case. However Alhambra asbestos lawsuits continue defend these claims tooth and nail.